|
|
摘录ZM对皇马vs曼城大战的技战术分析
题目：Real Madrid 3-2 Manchester City: second half switches leave City exposed down their right皇马3-2曼城技战术：曼奇尼下半场换人导致曼城右路暴露在皇马强大的火力打击下
Zabaleta 萨巴莱塔
But the key change came from Mancini. Maicon picked up an injury and had to be replaced, and Zabaleta was the natural replacement. When he entered the pitch, Zabaleta clearly signalled ‘3′ to his teammates – which hints that the previous formation had been slightly more flexible. (Mancini had definitely changed system at the break, but if he’d changed to a permanent three-man defence why would Zabaleta need to tell his teammates they were playing three at the back? He would have just replaced Maicon with no further tactical instructions required).
但关键的换人来自曼奇尼。麦孔受伤需要被换下，而萨巴莱塔是理所当然的替补。当他出场时对同伴清晰地作出了“3”的手势——暗示之前的阵型是比较灵活的。（曼奇尼肯定在中场时改变了阵型，但如果他确实改成了固定的三人防线，那萨巴莱塔还有什么必要告诉他的队友踢三后卫呢？他只需要替补麦孔的位置就行，没必要给出进一步的战术指示）。
Zabaleta could have been the man to secure the win – Maicon was tired, and Zabaleta could have sat deep alongside the centre-backs and kept that side of the pitch quiet. However, he interpreted the wing-back role in a strange way – charging forward up the pitch unnecessarily (when City were ahead) and also getting drawn into very central positions, leaving the right flank completely bare.
萨巴莱塔本可以成为决定胜局的球员——麦孔累了，萨巴莱塔本可以回撤到中卫身边，保证球场那一侧不出乱子。然而他用一种奇怪的方式诠释了翼卫的踢法——毫无必要的压上（当曼城领先），以及站在特别靠中路的位置，留下了右路的大片空当。
City were now a shambles at the back, particularly down that flank. Kompany seemed completely unsure of his role, sometimes drifting too far towards the touchline (which left an unlikely centre-back pairing of Clichy and Nastasic in the centre), and sometimes remaining so central that Zabaleta was exposed two-versus-one by Ronaldo and Marcelo. Those two players had 15 shots between them over the course of the game – you expect that from Ronaldo, but the space afforded to Marcelo was extraordinary.
曼城的防线现在完全乱了章法，尤其在边路。孔帕尼似乎完全不明白自己的职责是什么，有时拉得太靠边（留下了一个不可能出现的中卫组合——克里希和纳斯塔西奇），有时又太靠中间，让萨巴莱塔独自面对C罗和马塞洛。这两个人全场有15脚射门——这对于C罗来说可以预料，但给马塞洛的空间太大了。
Real’s first and third goals came from their left – on both occasions, there simply weren’t enough City players on that side of the pitch. For that, both Mancini’s tinkering and Zabaleta’s poor positional play must take the blame.
皇马的第一和第三个进球都来自左路——两次都只是因为曼城在那一侧没有足够多的球员。对于这一点，曼奇尼的拙劣调整和萨巴莱塔坑爹的位置感都有责任。
Conclusion 结论
The final 15 minutes of the game was unrecognisable from the first 15, and with such a frantic climax to the match, it could have gone either way. Better goalkeeping from Joe Hart, for example, and City would have come away with a result.
比赛的前15分钟和最后15分钟大相径庭，在这样狂乱的氛围下，比赛可能出现任何结局。打个比方，如果乔哈特扑救再逆天一些，曼城就能全身而退。
But there was a glaring problem with City’s right for the final 20 minutes of the match, with the very basic problem being that City were undermanned on that flank. Somewhere amongst (a) Mancini’s decision to change formation (b) his instructions to his players (c) and Zabaleta’s positioning, City had a clear weakness that was fully exploited by Real.
但比赛最后20分钟曼城的右路有明显的漏洞，基本的问题是曼城在那一侧没有足够的人。不管是(a)曼奇尼调整阵型的决定、（b）他给球员的指示，还是（c）萨巴莱塔的位置感，曼城的这处软肋被皇马充分利用了。
双方首发阵容
下半场开始阵容调整
|
|
[复制链接]
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2012-9-19 15:23:46
Cristiano Ronaldo (FWL)
Aleksandar Kolarov (Sub)
QQ好友和群
QQ空间
腾讯微博
腾讯朋友
微信
收藏
转播
分享
淘帖
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
楼主
Javier Pastore (AMC)
Miguel Veloso (DMC)
Lucho González (MC)
Duje Cop (FW)
Isco (FW)
Roman Shirokov (MC)
