设为首页收藏本站

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

楼主: Alex2011
打印 上一主题 下一主题

11-12 ZM专贴(拜仁1-1蓝军:客队赢得点球大战)

[复制链接]
1001#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-19 18:08:05 | 只看该作者
1000楼参考译文
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1002#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-19 18:14:33 | 只看该作者
这篇前瞻真能扯呀

扯啥10半决赛巴萨vs国米之战呢
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1003#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-19 18:18:05 | 只看该作者
偶猜一下结果吧,大概是08决赛结果吧

点球决胜,拜仁取胜

哈哈
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1004#
发表于 2012-5-20 04:16:43 | 只看该作者
我擦,非洲刘德华面前,所有前锋包括梅西跳水都是渣
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1005#
发表于 2012-5-20 07:40:47 | 只看该作者
德国人打点球输给英国人……
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1006#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:03:21 | 只看该作者
我擦,非洲刘德华面前,所有前锋包括梅西跳水都是渣
笑啊笑啊的猪 发表于 2012-5-20 04:16


先拍个照吧


欧是正儿八经的阿迷、西迷加德迷

而且是车子黑,但是看了切尔西点球大战是脱胎换骨,我也为他们精神境界所打动

祝贺他们,他们顶着压力,战胜了自己,配得上这场伟大胜利!

但是他们胜利,用不着任何失败者当替死鬼呀,这是他们自己赢来的

你个大阿黑,尤其是梅西黑!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1007#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:05:43 | 只看该作者
我真心希望德罗巴拿下先生,虽然可能性还是不大。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1008#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:40:03 | 只看该作者
德国人打点球输给英国人……
白与蓝之舞 发表于 2012-5-20 07:40


也不完全是吧

守门员之战是德国人败给了切赫,不是英国人啦

拜仁三个罚丢点球者,罗本、奥利奇、小猪

但是小猪不应该啦

这也说明德国人不是不可以战胜的

欧在看到当德罗巴头球扳平比分时,就想到了06年阿德之战有关换人和点球大战!

区别很大,但是却在关键处有那么几分极其相似的地方!

海因里斯用范比藤换下穆勒那一瞬间,偶以及张嘿嘿可能都不约而同,有一种不详之感

张嘿嘿,在德罗巴刚扳平比分那一刻就说,介个换人值得商榷。。。

但欧比他却想得更多!欧想着拜仁点球大战,赢面很大的

然而,欧没想到的是,点球大战未到时,里贝里就已经为拜仁先赢得了取胜或者领先的机会,可是罗本罚丢了点球,90分钟之前里贝里曾经打进一个越位球。。。

诡异的是,里贝里赢得点球时,自己先是抽痉了,之后他娘的却一瘸一拐地下场了,难道丫知道不堪点球大战之重吗

120分钟结束,点球大战未开始时,罗本就被己队心理师所干预,可是不幸的是第1轮拜仁5个主罚者竟然木有罗本,这又是海因里斯败笔地方!

点球大战,拉姆点球罚进,不过切赫已经判断了方向,而马塔在诺伊尔门线舞影响下,罚丢了点球,1-0,拜仁领先

第二下,戈麦斯罚中,大卫路易兹也罚中,但是切赫判断方向,而诺伊尔没有;2-1

第三下,诺伊尔主罚命中,兰帕德也罚中,切赫比诺伊尔守门还是较高,尽管比分是3-2

第四下,奥利奇出场,坏了,镜头闪现在他脸上时,就有点阻抑感觉,果不其然,切赫果断用单手打掉了他南辕北辙的点球;而阿什利科尔点球果断命中,3-3!诺伊尔判断不济于事,贺炜老说他又在耍门线舞,显然心里素质不如老道的切赫!

第五下,小猪出场,压力剧增!有一个镜头很有趣的,罗本在加时赛罚点球时,他就背对罗本面对诺伊尔,不敢看的!罗本罚丢后,他还不敢看没回过头来,诺伊尔赶紧拍抱着头的他,提醒他罗本点球罚失了,让他赶紧参与防守,可见德国人心脏也不是钢铁做的,也有不能承受之重的。果然他运气不好,在切赫神勇扑救下,球打在左立柱下角弹出;

就剩下德罗巴了,之前如果罗本罚进他送给里贝里点球,那么非洲刘德华就是车子“罪人”了,是切赫挽救他,现在由他来挽救自己,他木有像今年初非洲杯上那么怂样,他罚进了点球,同样干脆利索!

是切赫战胜诺伊尔!

车子防守帮助他们连克巴萨和拜仁,而最大功臣就是切赫,要不是他神勇,拜仁上半场就有进球的!

例如,在德罗巴头球扳平比分前,车子的角球与拜仁的角球之比是0比16(仅凭看直播时大概印象吧,不太准确的)!

不得不说,车子候补教练迪马涛居绝对是个灵魂巫师,比海老鬼淡定多了!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1009#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:40:51 | 只看该作者
我真心希望德罗巴拿下先生,虽然可能性还是不大。
白与蓝之舞 发表于 2012-5-20 08:05


欧希望是切赫!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1010#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:46:50 | 只看该作者
德罗巴拿下先生后来中超,哈哈哈,本朝联赛就引进世界足球先生了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1011#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:48:14 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 pedro 于 2012-5-20 08:51 编辑

替补奥利奇罚丢点球,与当年的阿队替补坎比罚丢点球,是多么的宿命相似!
而主力小猪罚丢点球,又与当年的阿队主力阿亚拉罚丢,又是多么的宿命相似!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1012#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:50:33 | 只看该作者
非洲刘德华,他nb了,接连去安慰罗本和小猪,这胜利者姿态作得比刘德华还刘德华,今晨他又介个资本

罗本,千年老二的外号该由他顶替巴拉克了! 哈哈
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1013#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:50:56 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 pedro 于 2012-5-20 08:53 编辑

非洲刘德华,太nb了,接连去安慰罗本和小猪,这胜利者姿态作得比刘德华还刘德华,今晨他有介个资本的!

罗本,千年老二的外号该由他顶替巴拉克了! 哈哈
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1014#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:52:51 | 只看该作者
德罗巴拿下先生后来中超,哈哈哈,本朝联赛就引进世界足球先生了。
白与蓝之舞 发表于 2012-5-20 08:46


他下赛季还在切尔西吗?下半年表现还是未知数的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1015#
发表于 2012-5-20 08:55:47 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 pedro 于 2012-5-20 08:57 编辑
偶猜一下结果吧,大概是08决赛结果吧

点球决胜,拜仁取胜

哈哈
Alex2011 发表于 2012-5-19 18:18


偶猜对了过程和结局,却木有猜对结局的取胜方向

着了历史经验主义的道,嘿嘿!

斑竹,这算不算准准赌棍级别啦
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1016#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-21 07:33:56 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-5-21 07:36 编辑

Bayern 1-1 Chelsea: Chelsea win it on penalties
May 20, 2012


The starting line-ups

Chelsea lifted the European Cup after a tight match was decided on penalties.

Jupp Heynckes named his expected line-up: Diego Contento came into the side at left-back, Antoliy Tymoshchuk played at centre-back, with Toni Kroos deep in midfield, allowing Thomas Muller a start in the attacking role.

Roberto Di Matteo’s line-up featured one surprise name – Ryan Bertrand was given his Champions League debut on the left side of midfield, meaning Florent Malouda was only on the bench.

The tactical battle didn’t really go Chelsea’s way – but the penalty shoot-out did.

Possession

As expected, Bayern saw more of the ball, although their first half domination was very slightly less than the 60-65% predicted in the preview. In a strange way, Chelsea’s attacks might have been more dangerous had that figure increased – Bayern weren’t committing huge numbers forward into the final third or piling on the pressure, and therefore Chelsea didn’t have many spaces to break into. Credit should go to Bayern for this, though – the full-backs were reserved and Didier Drogba wasn’t a huge force upon the game until late on.

Midfield battle

Often, games where one side sits deep and allows the opposition onto them don’t really have a ‘midfield battle’ – one side is letting the other dictate the play, and focus upon getting men behind the ball.

This was slightly different, however. Di Matteo’s decision to go with a 4-2-3-1, rather than the 4-3-3 he used against Barcelona (although really, this was 4-4-1-1 and 4-5-1 respectively, considering that Chelsea spent the majority of the time without the ball) was crucial. Instead of having three defensive-minded midfielders, the absence of Raul Meireles meant he only had two: Frank Lampard and John Obi Mikel. Juan Mata was higher up, in a natural number ten position, and only half-heartedly helped out defensively.

There were two reasons that Mata didn’t concentrate on getting goalside of Bayern’s midfielders. First, the fluidity of Kroos and Bastian Schweinsteiger caused him problems – when Mata dropped onto one, that man would stay in position and allow the other forward – Mata often found himself unable to occupy the right player at the right time. Second, Di Matteo probably told Mata to stay in space, in positions where he could receive the ball and prompt breaks, a little like Shinji Kagawa did against Bayern last weekend in the German Cup final. Mata found this difficult, however, and with Bayern’s full-backs staying quite deep and Chelsea’s wingers not able to break past, Chelsea’s transitions weren’t very effective.



Muller

Muller was the game’s key player. As mentioned in the preview, when played as the number ten Muller tends to drift right. This was probably partly the reason Di Matteo chose to field a defensive-minded player on the left wing, in order to give Ashley Cole more protection if Muller tried to overload him.

But although Muller was right-of-centre, he didn’t have to move out to the right wing because he found a little pocket of space to work in. With Frank Lampard playing slightly higher up than Jon Obi Mikel, the biggest area of space between Chelsea’s lines was perfect for Muller, and he continually picked up the ball in behind Lampard.



Chelsea were particularly vulnerable when their two problems [(a) one of the deep midfielders bursting forward unchecked and (b) Muller getting space] combined. Once in the first half, for example, Mikel was dragged across towards Muller, which then left his zone bare, so Schweinsteiger stormed into it and had an attempt from a left-centre position.

Bertrand’s other task, to help Cole defend against Robben, broadly worked. The Dutchman may have had 15 (!) attempts on goal in the 120 minutes, more than Chelsea, but the majority came when he was off-balance, and when he had been shepherded into a pack of Chelsea players. Chelsea’s ability to block shots was unbelievable – they blocked over half of Bayern’s 43 attempts, partly as they defended so narrow.



Transitions

Nothing really went right for Chelsea in an attacking sense, though – Mata struggled to prompt counters, Drogba found himself outnumered and when he peeled away onto Philipp Lahm to try and use his aerial advantage, the delivery from the right was poor. Chelsea also failed to win a corner until the final moments, so set-pieces wasn’t a productive source of chances, while long balls from Petr Cech generally found Tymoshchuk nipping in front of Drogba and Jerome Boateng covering behind him.

The game didn’t really progress in tactical terms – the only substitution before Bayern’s goal was Malouda replacing Bertrand, which seemed partly due to fitness reasons. Chelsea’s shape didn’t alter.

Goals

But Muller increasingly became pivotal. In addition to getting space between the lines, he kept popping up at the far post, against Cole. In a 20-minute spell that culminated in his goal, Muller had five attempts from a similar position, and also got John Obi Mikel booked for a rash tackle towards Chelsea’s left-back zone. He was the game’s key player in tactical terms, and would have been a fitting matchwinner.

Both coaches changed things after Bayern went 1-0 up. Di Matteo went for broke – Torres on for Kalou, and Chelsea went with a shapeless, desperate but completely understandable two-striker approach for the final minutes. They seemed as likely to concede a goal as score one, but from their only corner of the entire match, Drogba pounced with a superb header.

Heynckes had responded to Chelsea’s change by introducing an extra defender – Daniel van Buyten came on to provide more aerial presence at the back, with Muller departing. Like Chelsea’s change, it was simply another man to help in the required zone for five minutes.

Extra time

But it wasn’t just five minutes – because Drogba’s equaliser forced extra-time from Chelsea’s only corner of the game.



Therefore, both managers now had to shuffle their players into a workable system. This was easier for Heynckes: Tymoshchuk could move forward into Kroos’ role, Kroos could move forward into Muller’s role, and Bayern were in a fairly natural formation they could have started the match with. However, without Muller’s clever positioning, they were less of a threat going forward.

Di Matteo was in a more difficult situation – he wanted to keep the same formation, but had two strikers on the pitch. Rather than assigning either Drogba or Torres to the right-sided position on a full-time basis (or bringing on Michael Essien to play there) he asked Drogba and Torres to switch positions and take it in turns to defend that side of the pitch. Chelsea didn’t look comfortable there, however, and Drogba’s clumsy tackle on Ribery resulted in a penalty, missed by Robben.

Chelsea very nearly paid for Di Matteo’s refusal to introduce a more defensive-minded player – but while Heynckes made a defensive change after Bayern’s goal, when Chelsea equalised Di Matteo kept two strikers on the pitch. He must have been tempted to replace Drogba – but the Ivorian ended up scoring the winning penalty.



Conclusion

Despite losing the tie, Bayern won the tactical battle. The fluidity of their two deep midfielders meant they kept on creating good chances, while Muller’s positioning was a continual problem and something Chelsea never responded to. Roberto Di Matteo’s side defended much better against Barcelona (even if Pep Guardiola’s side also created chances), which was probably because they played with an extra holding midfielder in that match, rather than because of the selection problems in defence tonight.

Indeed, Chelsea’s last-ditch defending was superb – David Luiz and Gary Cahill played remarkably well considering both were injury doubts, while Ashley Cole’s ability to spot danger and react to it quickly was once again highly impressive. Petr Cech also starred in goal, and while Mikel couldn’t cover the entire space in front of the defence, he did his job manfully.

Just as in the Europa League final, the FA Cup final and the German Cup final, the more reactive side emerged victorious.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1017#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-21 07:37:45 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-5-21 23:18 编辑

1016楼参考译文

---------------

ZM欧冠决赛战术分析:黄沙百战穿金甲,破得楼兰始还家

由 maryantonia 发表在虎扑足球·切尔西专区

May 20, 2012

首发阵容

120分钟的不分胜负带来了残酷的点球大战,切尔西最终捧得大耳朵杯。
海因克斯排出的阵容与人们预计的一样:孔滕托出任左后卫,季莫什丘克出任中卫,克罗斯后撤,托马斯-穆勒首发承担攻击任务。
迪马特奥的首发名单里则出现了一个让人惊讶的名字——瑞恩-伯特兰德得到了欧冠首秀的机会,他占据了中场左翼的位置,而马卢达则留在替补席里。
技战术方面的争斗并没有真的按照切尔西想要的方式来进行——不过点球大战的结果倒是如他们所愿。

控球
跟想象中的一样,拜仁控球占了上风,但是他们上半场的优势比赛前预测的60-65%要稍微低一些。奇怪的是,如果这个数字上升的话,切尔西的攻击才会更加危险——但拜仁并没有在向对方后场的前进中投入大量兵力,也没有施加太大的压力,因此切尔西也没有太多的反击空间。不过,拜仁应该得到表扬的是他们的边后卫都很注意防守,因此德罗巴直到比赛后期才表现出了自己的威力。
中场的争斗
如果一方退守很深,让另一方进攻的话,这样的比赛一般不太会出现“中场的争斗”——因为退守的一方会任由对方掌控比赛,只是集中精力于寻找对方防线后的空间。
然而,这场比赛有些微的不同。迪马特奥使用的是4-2-3-1,而不是对阵巴塞罗那时候的4-3-3(不过,考虑到切尔西多数时间内处于无球状态,实际的阵型分别是4-4-1-1和4-5-1),这一点很关键。梅莱勒斯的缺阵让迪马特奥手中防守为主的三中场只剩下两人:兰帕德和米克尔。胡安-马塔的位置更靠前,他位于10号位置,只能承担一部分的防守任务。
马塔并没有致力于防守拜仁的中场球员,这有两个原因。首先,克罗斯和施魏因施泰格的流畅性让他有些吃力——如果他贴近其中一位,那么这个人就会卡住自己的位置,让另一位前插——于是马塔经常发现自己无法在正确的时间卡住正确的人选。其次,迪马特奥可能告诉马塔要留在空档里,也就是留在他能够接到球随即发起反击的位置,有点像上周末德国杯决赛中香川真司所做的那样。然而,马塔发现很难完成这个任务,而且拜仁的边卫也一直留在很深的位置,这让切尔西的边锋无法发起快速反击,因此蓝军的攻防转换并不是非常有效。

穆勒
穆勒是全场比赛的关键人物。正如前瞻中提到的那样,穆勒在作为10号球员的时候,他倾向于游移到右边。这大概也是为什么迪马特奥在左边翼选择了侧重于防守的球员,这是为了给阿什利-科尔更多的保护,尤其是在穆勒想要越过他的时候。
但是尽管穆勒位于中路偏右,他并不需要真的移到右边锋的位置,因为他已经找到了可以发挥作用的空间。由于兰帕德的位置比米克尔稍微靠前一点点,这也就形成了切尔西阵中最大的空间,对穆勒来说再完美不过了,于是他选择持续地在兰帕德身后拿球。

于是,切尔西同时遇到了两个难题:1. 中场深处的两名球员之一有些冒进地前插;2. 穆勒得到了空间,这时蓝军就显得特别脆弱。比如说上半场有一次,米克尔被穆勒拖离了位置,他留下的空间就失去了保护,因此施魏因施泰格得以迅速前压,在中间偏左的位置得到了一次机会。
伯特兰德的另一个任务是帮助科尔防守罗本,他完成的不错。荷兰人在120分钟之内大概完成了15脚射门,比切尔西全队加起来还要多,但是大部分都来自于他失去平衡或者被一堆切尔西球员围剿的时候。切尔西封堵射门的能力令人瞠目结舌——他们挡住了拜仁43次射门中的一半,这也部分归功于蓝军防线收缩得很狭窄。

攻防转换
不过,切尔西在进攻意识方面其实并没有找对路——马塔很难发起反击,德罗巴则双拳难敌四手,当他游移到边路试图利用自己强于拉姆的空中优势时,右路的长传又没有什么准头。切尔西一直到最后时刻才赢得了一次角球,因此也没能在定位球上创造出机会,而切赫的长传又往往被德罗巴身前的季莫什丘克得到,而博阿滕在补位上也做的很好。
比赛并没有什么技战术方面的进展——在拜仁进球之前,场上唯一的一次换人是切尔西方面用马卢达替下伯特兰德,这看起来应该是出于体力方面的考虑,切尔西的阵型并没有发生变化。
进球
但是穆勒变得越来越关键。除了插入对方阵型的空档之外,他还持续地出现在远门柱处找科尔的麻烦。在他进球之前的大概20分钟内,穆勒有五次出现在相同的位置,而且还让米克尔在切尔西左后方的位置因情急之下的铲球而吃了一张黄牌。从战术角度来看,穆勒是本场比赛的关键人物,他本来应该是赢球的一方。
双方主帅都在拜仁1-0领先之后做出了换人。迪马特奥打算孤注一掷——他用托雷斯换下了卡劳,这时的切尔西已经抛弃了阵型,打算在最后时刻用双前锋放手一搏,这种做法有些绝望,但也非常容易理解。蓝军看起来进球丢球的可能性都很大,但是在他们全场获得的唯一一个角球里,德罗巴以一记精彩的头球让球队起死回生。
海因克斯对切尔西的调整也做出了反应,他又派上了一位防守球员——范比滕替下了穆勒,给拜仁的后防线增加了空中优势。跟切尔西的换人一样,这也只是在最后的五分钟给最需要的区域加大了兵力。
加时赛
只是,比赛在五分钟后并没有结束——切尔西唯一的一次角球机会让德罗巴扳平比分,也把比赛拖入了加时。

因此,两位主教练现在就必须要把阵型调整一下了。对海因克斯来说要容易些:季莫什丘克可以前移至克罗斯的位置,这样克罗斯就可以前移至穆勒之前的位置,这样拜仁的阵型就跟开场时候差不多了。然而,没有了穆勒聪明的跑位,他们攻击的威力小了许多。
迪马特奥的情况要艰难些——他想保持一样的阵型,但是场上却有两名前锋。不过,他并没有让德罗巴或者托雷斯去右边锋的位置(或者换上埃辛去右路),而是让两位前锋通过换位而轮流防守右翼。然而,这个方法让切尔西的右路看起来有些别扭,而且德罗巴对里贝里的那次有些笨拙的铲球还被判了点球,结果罗本却没能将球罚进。
切尔西差点就为迪马特奥拒绝派上防守型球员而付出代价——海因克斯在拜仁进球后决定换人加强防守,而切尔西扳平时迪马特奥却继续让两名前锋都留在场上。他一定曾经想过要换下德罗巴——然而最后还是科特迪瓦前锋打入了制胜的点球。

结论
尽管输掉了比赛,但拜仁却是战术方面的赢家。他们两位拖后中场的流动性持续地创造着好机会,而穆勒的跑位则一直让切尔西头疼不已却无计可施。迪马特奥的球队在防守巴萨的时候表现得更好(即使瓜迪奥拉的球队也创造了机会),这可能是因为他们在那场比赛中多了一名后腰,并非是今晚比赛的防守人选表现得不够好。
确实,切尔西的最后一道防线无与伦比——刚刚伤愈复出的大卫-鲁伊兹和加里-卡希尔表现得都非常出色,而阿什利-科尔对威胁的嗅觉和快速反应则再一次发挥得淋漓尽致。站在球门前的切赫也送上了星级发挥,尽管米克尔并不能覆盖住防线之前的全部空间,但他的任务也完成得勇敢刚绝。
正如欧联杯决赛、足总杯决赛还有德国杯决赛中一样,反应更出色的球队最终获胜。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1018#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-21 23:21:12 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-5-21 23:24 编辑

还是那句话,换下穆勒是海因克斯最大败笔,除此之外,拜仁都比切尔西踢得要好的

刚换下不几分钟,拜仁就丢了球

正如当年佩克尔曼换下罗曼一样,想守住1-0微弱优势,却被拖入了最不想罚点球但却难以逃脱的境地
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|阿根廷风暴 ( 沪ICP备05003678号   

GMT+8, 2024-5-12 04:36 , Processed in 0.093750 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表