|
|
总算等到了大妈的工作总结
还来个米体的赛季转会盘点就可以彻底收工了～
Branca: "Less media limelight, more substance"
Friday, 02 September 2011 18:39:36
http://www.inter.it/aas/news/reader?N=37384&L=en
APPIANO GENTILE – After two days of press conferences unveiling Inter's latest signings, technical director Marco Branca answered some questions from journalists about the Nerazzurri's summer transfer business.
Now that it's all over, can you tell us if Wesley Sneijder will be happy to have stayed at Inter?
"I'm sure he is and I also believe there was interest in him. No offers, no negotiations with any clubs, but there was talk of interest being shown in him by another great club besides our own. I think the name I read most often was Manchester United. It's nice for him but it's also nice for us because it's proof of how good a player who belongs to our club is."
Was there never anything more than a chat with Carlos Tevez?
"If you think about the price quoted and confirmed on several occasions, €45 million, you should realise by yourselves that it was never going to happen."
Would it have been better to bring Kucka here straight away?
"No, he came to Italy last year and he hasn't played that many games in Serie A yet, so we're happy for him to continue playing for a good team like Genoa. It will help him settle in better and keep developing his physical and technical abilities. We're sure he'll be a better player next season than he is now."
How do you rate your summer transfer business overall? Are you satisfied?
"Being satisfied with your transfer business only counts up to a point because what really matters is being satisfied at the end of the season, so it's something we should assess then. We're certainly satisfied with the solutions we came up with and which followed the very clear guidelines we set ourselves."
Why Mauro Zarate and not Rodrigo Palacio?
"A technical choice, a question of opportunity and those guidelines we're following."
Generally speaking, would you say it was a fairly low-key transfer window?
"I think to a certain extent this transfer window signalled a defeat for our system, which doesn't depend on Inter, Milan, Juve, Roma or any of the other big teams. It's the system that holds us back and which makes it hard for us to compete in terms of generating income. It penalises us as clubs and of course you journalists often pass over that fact when writing about how all the big players are leaving Italy. I think we need to sound the alarm call because this is a very popular sport and I don't see why we should be penalising ourselves as a society when we know what needs to be done."
What's your reply to those who say Eto'o should have been sold at a much higher price?
"It you consider everything the Eto'o deal goes close to 100 million euros, because at the moment, unfortunately, we also have to calculate the costs no longer borne by the club. We're talking about a fantastic striker who is 30 years old and who, in footballing terms, nobody wanted to see leave and who, in footballing terms, would have preferred to keep playing on the big stage, for the Champions League and the Ballon d'Or, but he realised he had been offered this crazy contract. So as friends, as companions who achieved many victories together, we found a solution that was right for him and for us too. It's not so much Inter that wanted to sell him but a system which is lagging behind a bit."
Is it true that there were some problems between Marco Branca and president Moratti?
"No, no problem whatsoever."
Are those precise guidelines you mentioned earlier more a reference to the financial fair play regulations or the Italianisation of Inter's squad?
"Italianising our squad, in all honesty, has never been a major consideration for us, in the sense that we've always enjoyed, and always will enjoy, welcoming great talents to this club. But necessarily we have to be careful with wages because we're working with around 40% less income than other big European clubs, and I think it's essential for us to stay within certain parameters so that we can carry on taking part in the Champions League."
Do you have any regrets at the end of this transfer window or did you manage to achieve everything you wanted?
"We achieved everything we wanted."
Do you think that maybe you weren't given enough credit for the Zarate deal in the media, considering the terms of the agreement for a young, important player who has always performed well in Italy?
"That's fine by us. As a club we aren't particularly interested in the media limelight. We have millions of fans but we don't really follow the media's obsession with our game. We focus more on substance."
Press Office
布兰卡：少一点媒体关注，多一点实在的东西
9月2日阿皮亚诺詹蒂莱消息：国际米兰新援在这两天亮相，技术总监马尔科·布兰卡也回答了有关夏季转会的一些问题。
现在一切结束了，可以告诉我们，斯内德为留在国际米兰开心吗？
我肯定他会的，我也相信其他俱乐部仍然对他有兴趣。没有报价，没有与任何俱乐部的谈判，但除了我们以外，还有其他豪门表现出对他的兴趣。我认为我读到最多的名字是曼联。这对他是好事，对我们也是，因为这证明我们拥有一个多么优秀的球员。
与特维斯之间难道除了聊天就没有其他事情吗？
如果你相信特维斯的转会费有4500万欧元，你应该明白不可能发生。
直接把库茨卡带到国际米兰会不会更好？
不，他上赛季刚来意大利，意甲经验还不多，因此我们很高兴让他继续在热那亚这样优秀的球队锻炼。这能让他更好地适应，加强身体和技术能力。我们相信下赛季他将变得更好。
你怎么给夏季转会评分？你满意吗？
是否满意，最终要看赛季末的结果。我们对解决问题的方式很满意，思路非常清楚。
为什么是萨拉特，不是帕拉西奥？
一个技术选择，一个机会问题以及我们遵循的方针。
可以说这是个没有大手笔的转会窗口吗？
我认为这是我们体系的失败，不取决于国际米兰、AC米兰、尤文图斯、罗马或其它大俱乐部。这个体系让我们退步，让我们难以增加收入。这对我们俱乐部是伤害，但你们记者常常忽略这些，只在报纸上写有多少大牌球员离开意大利。我们应该敲响警钟了，这是一项非常受欢迎的运动，我不明白为什么当我们都知道该做什么时，还被这个体系所伤害。
有人说埃托奥应该卖出更高身价，你怎么看？
考虑一切费用的话，埃托奥的转会涉及1亿欧元，我们还要把俱乐部承担的其他部分计算在内。我们谈的是一个30岁的超级前锋，没有人想看到他离开，而球员也更愿意参加高水平的欧冠，角逐金球奖，但埃托奥意识到，他得到的是一份疯狂的合同。作为一起赢得许多胜利的朋友和伙伴，我们找到了对他、对我们都合适的解决办法，国际米兰不是那么想卖他，但我们的体系已经落后了。
布兰卡和莫拉蒂之间有问题，是真的吗？
不，没有任何问题。
你之前提到的方针指的是财务公平原则还是阵容本土化？
阵容本土化从来不是我们首先考虑的，我们一直欢迎天才球员来到俱乐部。但我们必须对薪资在意，因为我们的收入比其他欧洲豪门少40%，我们必须坚守一些原则，以保证我们继续参加欧冠。
转会窗口关闭后，你有什么后悔吗？你完成了一切想要做的吗？
我们完成了一切想做的事情。
你在媒体面前好像不怎么热衷于谈论萨拉特的转会？他是个年轻、重要的球员，在意大利一直表现出色。
这对我们是好事。我们不是特别在乎媒体的关注，我们有千百万球迷，我们不以吸引媒体聚焦为目的，我们更关注实质的东西。 |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
楼主
