[ZM欧洲杯] 30L葡萄牙1-0捷克战术解析

thewall

荷兰队三战全负积0分，是本届杯赛至今为止，第一支积0分的出局队伍，也是第三支被淘汰队伍；

前两支是A组的俄罗斯4分、波兰2分

荷兰队3战进球丢5球净胜球-3

波兰队3战进2球丢3球净胜球-1

那么本届杯赛到目前为止，在已经出局的队伍中，防守最差队伍诞生了，就是荷兰队

当然爱尔兰净胜球目前为-6，不过还有最后一战去挽回颜面的

thewall

3楼参考译文
-----------
来自虎扑

乌克兰2-1瑞典战术复盘：舍甫琴科的华美演出

2012-06-12

首发阵容

本届大赛迄今为止最完美的童话故事——安德烈-舍甫琴科在基辅上演的逆转宛若时光倒流。

尽管赛前广泛认为布洛辛会安排舍甫琴科替补，不过他还是出现在首发名单里，乌克兰阵容的其他位置与预测的一样。

哈姆伦却做出了一个令人大跌眼镜的选择，他让埃尔姆与卡尔斯特伦搭档镇守中场中路，托伊沃宁出任左路，罗森贝里突前。
这是一场罕见的比赛，进球与所有耐人寻味的战术安排毫无关系，只是来自于聪明的前锋对机会巧妙的把握，从本质上来说并不能代表两支球队90分钟的你来我往。

舍甫琴科的梅开二度鹤立鸡群，可以说凭一己之力赢得了比赛——他精彩绝伦的跑动和完美无缺的临门一击让两支球队高下立判——他并不是仅靠门前的嗅觉掌控比赛，他可以说是乌克兰获胜的根本原因。

阵型对抗

瑞典队的阵型与预测中大致相同，伊布拉希莫维奇从锋线上后撤。面对乌克兰长时间的控球，他们建立起了两排四人防线，只是在有球的时候阵型更具有流动性。

乌克兰也排出了预测的阵型——基本上来看是4-4-2，但是季莫什丘克和沃罗宁分别从自己所在的位置有明显后撤，看起来更像是4-1-3-1-1。

季莫什丘克vs伊布拉希莫维奇

这两人之间的争斗很有意思——伊布实际上移动到了瑞典的右路，但是季莫什丘克基本上是朝着伊布相反的方向活动，而让纳扎伦科突前在中场偏左的位置。尽管如此，季莫什丘克在比赛开始的阶段一直在试图盯防伊布，后者基本扮演的是10号球员的角色。



然而，伊布并不愿意被盯得这么紧，所以他做出了非常聪明的跑动。有的时候他会冒险移动到边路而远离季莫什丘克——季莫什丘克必须要护住中路以阻挡托伊沃宁、拉尔森和卡尔斯特伦进入这个区域——这样伊布就在比较靠边的位置得到了足够的空间。更多的时候他会成为二前锋，移动到很前场的位置，而季莫什丘克并不情愿后撤得这么深。

沃罗宁

沃罗宁是乌克兰阵型的关键所在，球队大部分的攻防组织他都有参与——他比瑞典中场后撤更深来进行串联，还负责了中场与舍甫琴科之间的链接。

他在无球状态下的作用也同样重要——他会后撤至中场，前去盯防卡尔斯特伦，致使瑞典队的进攻到卡尔斯特伦这里就很难进行下去。

乌克兰的反击

乌克兰控球时间很长，但是他们主要的威胁来自于边路的快速反击，左路是科诺普尔扬卡，右路是亚尔莫连科。只要乌克兰赢回球权，他们俩就会迅速突前，运球过人的技术都非常出色。不过，他们的最后一传质量不太稳定，而且当瑞典队及时回防的时候，两人的效果就没有那么突出了，不过他俩单凭带球下底就给瑞典队的后防线造成了很大的压力。司职边锋的两人有效地拉伸了阵型的宽度，还成为了长距离斜传的接应点。

乌克兰反击的时候特别具有威胁，这是因为瑞典队并没有擅长持球的球员。他们本应该让斯文森镇守中场中路——他本人更擅长控球而不是抢断——结果埃尔姆和卡尔斯特伦的组合让瑞典队的防线几乎完全暴露。卡尔斯特伦开场15分钟就因不得不强行阻断一次反击而吃到黄牌，这并不令人惊讶，而且哈姆伦又等了太久才派上斯文森（换下塔伊沃宁，埃尔姆移到边路），这时三个进球都已经完成了。
瑞典另外一个让人失望的地方是他们的定位球罚得很糟糕。乌克兰的防守纪律严明，并没有在射门范围内造成任何犯规，而拉尔森那次远距离的任意球造成的禁区传中又力量过大了。

舍甫琴科

不过本场比赛的主要看点并不是技战术方面，而是在于舍甫琴科的个人发挥。他整场比赛中的跑动都灵气十足，只是在速度和体力上有些不足。他接球然后就会设法绕到瑞典中卫身后，而且对球队的串联也非常出色。



舍甫琴科的两粒进球很相似——一个来自于右翼传中，另一个来自于左路的角球——但是全都归功于他向近门柱的迅速移动，以及完美的头球功夫。

换人

哈姆伦做出了调整，但基本保持了一样的阵型。威廉松的上场效果很好——他可以在边路带球过人，这也是瑞典队在上半场的不足之处。埃尔曼德替下了锋线的罗森贝里，他在终场前有一次绝佳机会，可惜没有把握住。
布洛辛的换人是出于体力上的考虑，他在最后十分钟换下了舍甫琴科、沃罗宁和科诺普尔扬卡，派上米列夫斯基、德维奇和罗坦。乌克兰的新鲜血液们最终保住了胜利的果实。

结论

瑞典的阵型看起来有些别扭——没有持球球员，边路也没有带来足够的扯动或者直接性。他们组织的进攻有时看起来坦率得令人吃惊，只顾寻找前锋，并不在中场下功夫。如果防守表现得好一些的话，他们本该赢下这场比赛，但是事与愿违。

乌克兰的进球几乎与他们的最佳时刻毫无关系，球队的进攻主要来自于边路球员，但是舍甫琴科是本场的主角，现在乌克兰在D组的形势一片光明——其他球队必须要主动进攻了，而乌克兰只要专心反击就好。

thewall

Czech Republic v Portugal preview

June 21, 2012


Probable starting line-ups

This is a battle between two reasonably similar teams. They may play different formations, but they have the same problems – and, most interestingly, will look to play down the same flank.

9 and 10?

The first similarity the lack of a prolific number nine. Milan Baros and Helder Postiga have both started all three games, but Milan Baros has had two shots in the competition (no goals) and Helder Postiga has had three (one goal). They’re simply not a consistent goal threat, and the main part of their job is holding the ball up, drawing fouls and linking with the wide players.

The second similarity is the absence of a creative attacking midfielder. We knew this about Portugal before the competition started, but for the Czechs it’s a new development. Tomas Rosicky’s injury means he’ll probably be on the bench tonight, and replacement Daniel Kolar struggles to replicate Rosicky’s impact upon matches.

Passing midfielders

The creative midfield battle will be decided primarily by the two ’second function’ midfielders – not the holders, Miguel Veloso and Tomas Hubschman, but the men just ahead. Jaroslav Plasil has enjoyed a good tournament, creating 14 chances in three games, while Joao Moutinho was excellent against Holland and should get time on the ball here.

It’s difficult to see who will close down Moutinho - Petr Jiracek will be concerned about Coentrao, Hubschman will protect the space in front of the back four, particularly the zone Cristiano Ronaldo wants to move into. Moutinho should be free, and will dictate the tempo of the game.

Key flank

The key battle is likely to be down the left flank. This is Portugal’s biggest strength going forward – they have the goalscoring potential of Ronaldo coming inside, and the overlapping threat of Fabio Coentrao bombing down the outside. But this means they’re also weak defensively down that side: all four goals they’ve conceded have originated from that side of the pitch, and Ronaldo’s non-tracking against Denmark was a problem Paulo Bento should have resolved earlier.

As it happens, the right has been the strongest area of the Czech side. Petr Jiracek has been excellent on the wing since he was switched there midway through the opening game against Russia, although he played two different roles in the subsequent games – he drifted inside quickly against Greece, but stayed much wider against Poland. He managed to score in both games, but it seems better for the balance of the side if he comes inside, so Theodor Gebre-Selassie can energetically stretch the play from deep.

Gebre-Selassie has been one of the competition’s best attacking full-backs, and while he’s in for the most difficult defensive test of his life up against Ronaldo, Michal Bilek will probably encourage him to move forward and test Ronaldo’s defensive positioning. You can’t leave that position bare against Ronaldo, of course, so Hubschman should be able to drift across and cover, potentially allowing the Czechs to create a 2 v 1 situation against Coentrao. Moutinho, unlikely to be concerned about forward runs from Hubschman, may have to help out.

But Jiracek is a hard worker without the ball, and he’ll track Coentrao back. With the support of Hubschman, the Czechs might fare reasonably well against the strongest part of the Portuguese side, although Ronaldo remains a huge threat.

Other side

Portugal might even be better switching the ball out to Nani – both Moutinho and Veloso are capable of good crossfield passes to that side, where the Manchester United winger should be able to take on David Limbersky in a 1 v 1 situation. Limbersky is inexperienced at this level, though he played well against Jakub Blaszczykowski in the Czechs’ previous game.

The final part of the battle on the flanks will be Vaclav Pilar against Joao Pereira. Pilar plays an interesting role, staying very wide and then looking to run in behind the full-back onto through-balls. Does Pereira stay narrow and shut off that space, risking Pilar getting the ball into feet too easily, or stick tight and risk being outpaced on the turn?

Approaches?

This might not be the most open game – both sides are broadly counter-attacking, and want their wingers to run with the ball. Both thrive when they have space to run into – Bilek and Bento will probably want their sides to sit deep early on, to stifle each other.

thewall

28楼参考译文

thewall

Portugal 1-0 Czech Republic: Ronaldo a constant threat and eventually gets the winner

June 21, 2012


The first half line-ups, though Ronaldo drifted around and Nani spent some time on the left

Cristiano Ronaldo was a greater goalscoring threat than the Czech side put together, as Portugal narrowly won a game that should have been safe much earlier.

Paulo Bento named an unchanged side again – he’s played this XI in Portugal’s last six competitive games, four at the Euros, two in the play-offs against Bosnia.

Michael Bilek was without Tomas Rosicky again, and used Vladimir Darida rather than Daniel Kolar in Rosicky’s attacking midfield role.

This was a one-sided game, with Portugal superior all over the pitch.

Shapes and overloads

The game settled down into a fairly predictable pattern and shape, with a 4-3-3 against a 4-2-3-1. Each midfielder had a specific opponent to track and the battles on the wings were clear 1 v 1s. The slight exceptions involved each side’s deepest midfielder occasionally becoming overloaded. Veloso played slightly left-of-centre and became distracted by Petr Jiracek’s drifts in from the flank, which forced him to leave Darida a couple of times. Darida is clearly an intelligent player and his positioning and movement caused Veloso some difficulties, but the youngsters didn’t have the necessary skill on the ball to influence the game.

At the other end, Tomas Hubschman played right-of-centre, trying to guard the zone Ronaldo was moving into. That meant he was concerned with a wide player rather than an opposition midfielder, and Portugal’s midfield runners could move into that zone unchecked.

Battle down the flank

The expected battle was down the Ronaldo flank, where Theodor Gebre-Selassie should have been braver with his positioning. He was (understandably but frustratingly) cautious with his positioning, only moving in advance of Ronaldo a couple of times. He focused much more on his defensive duties than in his previous three games. Further up, Jiracek marked Fabio Coentrao well.

Ronaldo had actually spent much of the first 20 minutes in more central positions, with Nani popping up on the left, though Portugal didn’t look particularly good with this system, and it coincided with their weakest spell of the game. When they moved to a natural 4-3-3, they were the better side by far.

A major feature of the first half was how tightly the Czech full-backs tried to stick to the Portuguese wingers when Portugal moved forward with the ball. Gebre-Selassie ended up in central positions a couple of times, practically in front of his centre-backs. Jiracek made sure Coentrao didn’t exploit the space too readily. On the other wing, Nani moved into deeper positions on the right, with David Limbersky moving up the pitch. Joao Pereira didn’t overlap particularly impressively.

The Portuguese midfield has changed from the opening game of the tournament. Here, Raul Meireles was to the left, Joao Moutinho to the right. See the change from the opening game against Germany:





This didn’t have a particularly big influence on the game – it meant the two midfield creators, Plasil and Moutinho, were against each other, and that Meireles had space ahead of him to break into, although his decision-making was often poor.

The Czechs struggled at attacking transitions – their creative players simply couldn’t get the ball because of some aimless balls down the pitch. One clearance from Limbersy, a flick-up-and-volley to absolutely no-one, summed it up.

Helder Postiga went off injured, with Hugo Almeida replacing him. This meant a more static central striker upfront for Portugal, though Almedia did reasonably well by occupying both centre-backs and creating space for others.

Midfield runners

Little changed after half-time, but Portugal made more of an effort to get midfielders forward into the final third. Whether it was by design or accident, their first chance of the second half demonstrated where the Czechs were logically going to be vulnerable. With the full-backs sticking tight to the Portuguese wingers, Portugal could get extra players into space in those wide zones. That’s what Meireles did straight away, moving to the left wingas Gebre-Selassie moved inside with Ronaldo, and Meireles crossed for a good near post chance for Almeida, who headed over. Portugal needed more of this thrust from midfield.

Bilek realised that Darida was struggling to get involved in the game, so withdrew him and pushed Jiracek inside, introducing Jan Rezek on the right. This didn’t really help – it was a slightly more direct approach, and more suited to counter-attacking, but aside from one Pilar solo run, the Czech Republic created little.

Ronaldo

The game became increasingly about Ronaldo. He’d hit the post with a brilliant turn and shot late in the first half, then hit the post from a long-range free-kick after the break. He largely abandoned his movements into central playmaking positions, choosing either to get the ball on the wing, or move directly into the box for crosses. This encouraged the midfield players forward, and both Meireles and Moutinho had shots from just outside the box, with the latter more impressive than the former.



Ronaldo’s winner had been coming. Portugal were spreading the ball wide to Nani, who had a couple of opportunities to cross in the minutes leading up to the goal. Sure enough, it was Moutinho storming forward from midfield unchecked into a wide zone – just like Meireles at the start of the second half – that resulted in the breakthrough, and Ronaldo’s excellent run across the face of Gebre-Selassie was the other key component. The expected team won, and the expected player scored the crucial goal.

Conclusion

This was a very unimpressive performance from Bilek’s side – they didn’t defend well, counter effectively or hold onto the ball for long periods. Their gameplan was unclear. Realistically, they’re simply not a good side. They overachieved by making it through Group A, so Bilek can be satisfied with his side’s performance, but further progression was unlikely.

This was probably Portugal’s best display of the competition, as their first clean sheet was combined with constant chance creation. They need better decision-making in the final third, and the midfield triangle will have to be more efficient against their semi-final opponents, but if Ronaldo is this visible in future matches, they have a realistic chance of winning the competition.

thewall

30楼参考译文
---------------
来自虎扑足球

葡萄牙1-0捷克：极具威胁的C罗最终锁定胜局

2012-06-22


上半场的首发阵型，不过C罗在前场横移，纳尼也有一段时间在左路活动

克里斯蒂亚诺-罗纳尔多一个人的威胁比整个捷克队加起来还要强大，但是本应早早锁定胜局的葡萄牙最后只拿到一球小胜。

保罗-本托再一次保持首发不变，葡萄牙队在过去的6场正赛中，也就是4场欧洲杯加上对波斯尼亚的2场附加赛，都使用了同样的首发11人。

比莱克则又一次失去了罗西基，不过这次他用来代替罗西基出任前腰的是达里达，而不是科拉什。

这是一场一边倒的比赛，葡萄牙完全占据上风。

阵型和负重

比赛的模式和阵型都与赛前预计的差不多，是一场4-3-3和4-2-3-1之间的较量。中场每一位球员都有专门的对手去盯防，两翼的对抗也是很明显的1对1。例外发生在每支球队中后撤最深的中场球员身上，他们偶尔会负担过重。维罗索位于中间偏左的位置，会被伊拉切克从边翼的内切带离位置，于是他不得不几次被迫放弃达里达。达里达显然球商很高，他的卡位和跑位几次让维罗索陷入困境，不过这位捷克阵中最年轻的一员在有球状态下的技术还不足以影响比赛。

在另一端，许布施曼位于中间偏右的位置，他负责保护C罗内切试图闯入的区域。也就是说，着他着重关照的是一位边锋，而并非是对位的中场球员，于是葡萄牙的速度型中场们可以根本不遇抵抗就进入这个区域。

边路的争斗

预料之中的对抗发生在C罗这一侧，格布雷西拉西耶本应该在卡位方面更大胆一些的，结果他过于小心谨慎，只有几次突破进C罗身后的空间，其实这可以理解，但也令人有些沮丧。他比在前三场比赛中更注重自己的防守职责，不过，前边的伊拉切克倒是很好地看住了科恩特朗。

实际上，C罗在前20分钟里位于更靠中路的位置，出现在左路的是纳尼，不过葡萄牙好像不太适应这个阵型，这也是他们本场比赛中最脆弱的时间段，而在变成正常的4-3-3之后，他们就完全占据了上风。

上半场最主要的看点，是在葡萄牙带球前进的时候，捷克边后卫如何紧密盯防对方的边锋。格布雷西拉西耶有几次甚至来到了中路，也就是离他最近的中卫身前。伊拉切克则确保了科恩特朗不能从容利用自己周围的空间。在另一边，右路的纳尼在林贝尔斯基上前的时候后撤，佩雷拉也并没有特别激进地套边插上。

葡萄牙的中场与首战相比已经发生了变化，现在梅莱勒斯在左，穆蒂尼奥在右。对比一下首战对阵德国的时候：




不过，这个变化并没有对比赛造成很大影响——两方的中场核心普拉希尔和穆蒂尼奥是互相对位的，梅莱勒斯身前就出现了可以让他反击的空间，不过他做出的判断经常很让人无语。

捷克的攻防转换不够流畅——创造型球员们就是拿不到球，因为长传的落点通常很不靠谱。林贝尔斯基的一次解围很好地总结了这一切：随便大脚踢出去算了，管它落在什么地方呢。

波斯蒂加因伤被阿尔梅达换下，葡萄牙锋线上有了一位灵活性比较低的中锋，不过阿尔梅达的表现可圈可点，他吸引了对方的两名中卫，给队友扯出了空间。

速度型中场

易边再战之后并没有发生什么显著变化，不过葡萄牙更致力于让中场球员们突前进入攻击腹地。不知是计划好的还是偶然事件，葡萄牙下半场第一次机会就正中捷克最薄弱的部位。由于捷克边后卫贴身紧盯葡萄牙边锋，葡萄牙可以在边路的空间多加人手。这也就是梅莱勒斯所做的，他趁格布雷西拉西耶跟着C罗一起移动至中路的时候，直接移向左翼位置，随即送出传中给近门柱的阿尔梅达，这是个非常好的机会，可惜阿尔梅达顶高了。葡萄牙需要中场提供更多这样的威胁。

比莱克认识到达里达很难有什么作为，于是把他换下，让伊拉切克来到中路，右路换上雷泽克。这个换人收效不大——战术更加直接了，也更适合反击，但是除了皮拉尔偶尔那么一次的跑动之外，捷克并没有多少机会。

克里斯蒂亚诺-罗纳尔多

比赛逐渐被C罗一个人所左右。他在上半场有一次精彩的转身射门击中了门柱，下半场的一次直接任意球机会，他的远射也击中了门柱。这次他很少选择内切进中场组织核心的位置，而是要么在边路拿球，要么直接进入禁区接应传中。这大大带动了中场球员们的向前推进，梅莱勒斯和穆蒂尼奥都有在禁区外侧射门，后者比前者更令人印象深刻。



C罗的进球终于来了。葡萄牙一直在把球分到边路给纳尼，后者在很短的时间内就有好几次传中机会，最终导致了进球。没错，那个进球是无人盯防的穆蒂尼奥从中场突破至边路——正如梅莱勒斯在下半场刚开始时一样——造成的，而C罗绕过格布雷西拉西耶的完美跑动则是另一个重要因素。被看好的球队获胜了，打进关键球的人选也是众望所归。

结论

比莱克的球队发挥不佳——他们防守不够好，反击没什么效果，也没法长时间控球。捷克的计划不够明确。说实话，他们的确实力不济，能从A组突围已经让人惊喜，所以比莱克可以对球队的表现感到满意，再往前走的确有些强人所难。

这场比赛大概是葡萄牙本届大赛中表现最好的一次，不但首次力保球门不失，还持续地创造了很多机会。半决赛需要他们在对方腹地做出更敏锐的决策，中场三人组也需要更加高效，不过若是C罗在将来的比赛中也能如此具有存在感，谁说染指奖杯只是葡萄牙的白日梦呢。

thewall

zm说得好：三票始终在制造威胁，两中门柱后，终于收获唯一致胜球

不过，老马早前预测说，看好葡萄牙取胜，关键是葡萄牙拥有一个三票哥，而捷克木有